<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>dugfan</title><link>http://dugfan.kinja.com</link><description></description><language>en</language><item><title><![CDATA[You're one of the lucky ones. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/youre-one-of-the-lucky-ones-fios-isnt-available-to-the-473299188</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">You're one of the lucky ones. FiOS isn't available to the vast majority of households.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:41:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">473299188</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Montops! ]]></title><link>http://gawker.com/montops-dont-drink-the-kool-aid-this-is-a-great-piece-478011029</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Montops! Don't drink the Kool Aid. This is a great piece and you know it.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 5 Oct 2012 20:09:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">478011029</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA["flat, streamlined and sleek" = no individuality or personality = facism = corporate!]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/flat-streamlined-and-sleek-no-individuality-or-per-473895857</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">&quot;flat, streamlined and sleek&quot; = no individuality or personality = facism = corporate!</p>]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:47:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">473895857</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who the hell knows the truth here? ]]></title><link>http://gawker.com/who-the-hell-knows-the-truth-here-but-to-insist-theres-478204552</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Who the hell knows the truth here? But to insist there's absolutely no relation between Wikileaks and the rape accusation is to deny the obvious: extraordinarily powerful national and multi-national interests have a stake in defaming Assange and generally distracting him from Wikileaks' mission. This doesn't make him innocent—but it should make <em>us</em> more suspicious of the rape claim than we would otherwise be.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 19:30:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">478204552</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Actually, I'd prefer you go on and on about Shakespeare's satirical side.]]></title><link>http://jezebel.com/actually-id-prefer-you-go-on-and-on-about-shakespeares-460091725</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Actually, I'd prefer you go on and on about Shakespeare's satirical side.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:16:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">460091725</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Touché. ]]></title><link>http://jezebel.com/touche-id-want-my-son-to-read-this-as-well-460138772</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Touché. I'd want my son to read this as well.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 22:53:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">460138772</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Any honest portrait of rapists—if it's more honest than what's come before—must by definition move u]]></title><link>http://jezebel.com/any-honest-portrait-of-rapists-if-its-more-honest-than-460137969</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Any honest portrait of rapists—if it's more honest than what's come before—must by definition move us toward prevention in some way, even if it's not immediately obvious how. I'm horrified by these accounts, but mostly because they're so... I don't know... human, real. They make rape more frightening because they illustrate the utterly messy nature of perception. We have a startling capacity for cluelessness, delusion and dissociation. Seeing rapists in this way makes them more sympathetic, and that's disturbing, but it also makes them more familiar, and that's cautionary. I think if I had a teenage daughter, I'd want her to read this, to understand something about rape and people in general: average people are capable of extraordinary cruelty, and it doesn't take much to get there.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 22:16:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">460137969</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[In a Gawker post earlier today http://gawker.com/5923046, one of our writers wrote: "The right to pr]]></title><link>http://lifehacker.com/in-a-gawker-post-earlier-today-http-gawker-com-592304-465695184</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">In a Gawker post earlier today http://gawker.com/5923046, one of our writers wrote: &quot;The right to privacy, no matter how noble a concept in origin, automatically implies some level of guilt, embarrassment, and shame.&quot; What's your counterargument?</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:03:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">465695184</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Hey- can you give me details on environment/browser? ]]></title><link>http://io9.com/hey-can-you-give-me-details-on-environment-browser-th-282396989</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Hey- can you give me details on environment/browser? Thank you! [You can dismiss my comment as well.]</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:20:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">282396989</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[How the hell are you preparing to steer so delicately under 7 Gs???]]></title><link>http://jalopnik.com/how-the-hell-are-you-preparing-to-steer-so-delicately-u-142444903</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">How the hell are you preparing to steer so delicately under 7 Gs???</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:43:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">142444903</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[You're right. ]]></title><link>http://io9.com/youre-right-weve-retained-friends-and-followers-lists-282460612</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">You're right. We've retained friends and followers lists. The first iteration of Kinja doesn't include much functionality on this front, but we're working on this. Ideally, everyone will be able to see their friends' posts more readily.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:28:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">282460612</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA["Whoever destroys a soul destroys an entire world." ]]></title><link>http://io9.com/whoever-destroys-a-soul-destroys-an-entire-world-tha-282394741</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">&quot;Whoever destroys a soul destroys an entire world.&quot; That's not exactly egocentric.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:35:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">282394741</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[That's a possibility, of course. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/thats-a-possibility-of-course-but-users-will-adapt-to-485208944</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">That's a possibility, of course. But users will adapt to the new system. As Joe wrote today, &quot;Respond to the response, and you start getting the longer threads that are more visually familiar. That make sense?&quot; http://gizmodo.com/5921328/?comment=50398022</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 20:07:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">485208944</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[For the status-obsessed, hierarchy does exist. ]]></title><link>http://gizmodo.com/for-the-status-obsessed-hierarchy-does-exist-the-defa-474204254</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">For the status-obsessed, hierarchy does exist. The default discussions, the ones nearest the front, are those we consider best. If anyone's aiming for glory, he should write interesting posts. Great contributions will be featured more prominently.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:30:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">474204254</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[As in real life, a series of jokes is as valid a conversation as any other. ]]></title><link>http://deadspin.com/as-in-real-life-a-series-of-jokes-is-as-valid-a-conver-452023854</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">As in real life, a series of jokes is as valid a conversation as any other. We're not trying to encourage overwrought exchanges (&quot;Why yes, REV, I see your point and might I add...&quot;). Just recognize that you guys are chatting with one another, and it should work the way you'd like.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:54:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">452023854</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[That's a fair observation, but we're aiming for more conversation. ]]></title><link>http://deadspin.com/thats-a-fair-observation-but-were-aiming-for-more-conv-452023853</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">That's a fair observation, but we're aiming for more conversation. Since the system works in a different way, it'll take some getting used to. You can get what you want out of it. It's possible, on an average post with a few funny if irrelevant follow-ups, to achieve something very similar to the old view. In any case, we're listening. Thanks for the feedback.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:41:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">452023853</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[This is one way we're encouraging conversation as opposed to stand-alone posts. ]]></title><link>http://deadspin.com/this-is-one-way-were-encouraging-conversation-as-oppose-452023665</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">This is one way we're encouraging conversation as opposed to stand-alone posts. Quite simply, we'd like people to reply to one another.</p>]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 17:39:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">452023665</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rooftop Farewell]]></title><link>http://tech.kinja.com/rooftop-farewell-5918876</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="has-media media-640"><img alt="Rooftop Farewell" height="360" width="640" src="http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/17pw22tq2qpvtjpg/ku-xlarge.jpg" class="transform-ku-xlarge"/></p><p class="first-text"> Half of Gawker Tech lives in Budapest. We have various methods of keeping ourselves close, but nothing beats hanging out face to face. Here's our farewell dinner for six of our guys from Budapest on the Gawker roof deck last night. We were joined by, among others, our new Hungarian teacher, Edina. See you at <a href="http://tech.gawker.com/5914928/for-the-win" target="_blank">the portal</a>, guys!</p>]]></description><category domain="">farewell</category><category domain="">budapest</category><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5918876</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's worth noting this super-secure browser from the Tor Project. https://www.torproject.org/]]></title><link>http://gawker.com/its-worth-noting-this-super-secure-browser-from-the-tor-478598301</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">It's worth noting this super-secure browser from the Tor Project. https://www.torproject.org/ </p>
<p>More info from a Tor volunteer here: http://www.democracynow.org/2012/4/23/more_secrets_on_growing_state_surveillance</p>]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 8 May 2012 16:46:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">478598301</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mobile Monday]]></title><link>http://tech.kinja.com/mobile-monday-5906446</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Our mobile audience* as a percentage of total audience, for the week of April 23rd:</p>
<p>27% Deadspin<br/>
23% Jezebel<br/>
21% Gizmodo<br/>
21% Gawker<br/>
17% Jalopnik<br/>
17% Kotaku<br/>
16% Lifehacker<br/>
1% io9</p>
<p>19% Gawker Media Group</p>
<p>Exactly 1,650 mobile visits to i09 kept that site from an effective score of 0%. Plausible theories welcome in our new commenting system!</p>
<p>*iPads excluded / Source: Google Analytics</p>]]></description><category domain="">mobile</category><category domain="">traffic</category><category domain="">stats</category><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5906446</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mobile Monday]]></title><link>http://tech.kinja.com/mobile-monday-5902486</link><description><![CDATA[<p class="first-text">Our mobile audience as a percentage of total audience, for the week of April 9th:</p>
<p>27% Deadspin<br/>
23% Jezebel<br/>
21% Gizmodo<br/>
20% Gawker<br/>
17% Jalopnik<br/>
17% Kotaku<br/>
16% Lifehacker<br/>
1% io9</p>
<p>19% Gawker Media Group</p>
<p>Notably, 5% of io9's total audience is accessing the site via iPads. Where they're going, they don't need phones. (iPad users excluded from mobile audience.)</p>
<p>Source: Google Analytics</p>]]></description><category domain="">mobile</category><category domain="">traffic</category><category domain="">stats</category><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5902486</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Faneuil [Gawker Tech]]]></dc:creator></item></channel></rss>